Ralph Nader’s In, Obama And Clinton React…
February 25, 2008 | Permalink
Yesterday, on Meet The Press, Ralph Nader announced his candidacy for president this election, saying:
Let me put it in context, to make it a little more palatable to people who have closed minds. Twenty-four percent of the American people are satisfied with the state of the country, according to Gallup. That’s about the lowest ranking ever. Sixty-one percent think both major parties are failing. And, according to Frank Luntz’s poll, a Republican, 80 percent would consider voting for a independent this year. Now, you take that framework of people feeling locked out, shut, shut out, marginalized, disrespected and you go from Iraq to Palestine/Israel, from Enron to Wall Street, from Katrina to the bungling of the Bush administration, to the complicity of the Democrats in not stopping him on the war, stopping him on the tax cuts, getting a decent energy bill through, and you have to ask yourself, as a citizen, should we elaborate the issues that the two are not talking about? And the–all, all the candidates–McCain, Obama and Clinton–are against single payer health insurance, full Medicare for all. I’m for it, as well as millions of Americans and 59 percent of physicians in a forthcoming poll this April. People don’t like Pentagon waste, a bloated military budget, all the reports in the press and in the GAO reports. A wasteful defense is a weak defense. It takes away taxpayer money that can go to the necessities of the American people. That’s off the table to Obama and Clinton and McCain.
The issue of labor law reform, repealing the notorious Taft-Hartley Act that keeps workers who are now more defenseless than ever against corporate globalization from organizing to defend their interests. Cracking down on corporate crime. The media–the mainstream media repeatedly indicating how trillions of dollars have been drained and fleeced and looted from millions of workers and investors who don’t have many rights these days, and pensioners. You know, when you see the paralysis of the government, when you see Washington, D.C., be corporate-occupied territory, every department agency controlled by overwhelming presence of corporate lobbyists, corporate executives in high government positions, turning the government against its own people, you–one feels an obligation, Tim, to try to open the doorways, to try to get better ballot access, to respect dissent in America in the terms of third parties and, and independent candidates; to recognize historically that great issues have come in our history against slavery and women rights to vote and worker and farmer progressives, through little parties that never ran–won any national election. Dissent is the mother of ascent. And in that context, I have decided to run for president.
Nader’s entrance into the campaign is more significant for the Democrats than Republicans. Accordingly, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton responded to the news.
“I think anybody has the right to vote for president if they file sufficient papers. And I think the job of the Democratic Party is to be so compelling that a few percentage of the vote going to another candidate’s not going to make any difference.”
[When reporters reminded Obama that Nader had said some not-so nice things about him, Obama replied]
“He had called me and I think reached out to my campaign. My sense is that Mr. Nader is somebody who if you’re — don’t listen and adopt all of his policies, thinks you’re not substantive. He seems to have a pretty high opinion of his own work. Now, and by the way, I have to say that historically, he is a singular figure in American politics and has done as much as just about anybody on behalf of consumers. So in many ways, he is a heroic figure and I don’t mean to diminish him, but I do think there’s a sense now that um, you know if somebody’s not hewn to the Ralph Nader agenda then you, you must be lacking in some way.”
“Obviously it’s not helpful to whoever our Democratic nominee is. But it’s a free country.
“I don’t know what party he’ll run on. Where did he run on last time? Does anybody remember? … Was it on the Green Party?
“Well, you know, his being on the Green Party (ticket) prevented Al Gore from being the greenest president we could have had, and I think that’s really unfortunate. I think we paid a big price for it.”
[Photo Credit: Achievement.org]
Sphere: Related Content




[...] fvmoore wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptAccordingly, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton responded to the news. Barack Obama:. “I think anybody has the right to vote for president if they file sufficient papers. And I think the job of the Democratic Party is to be so compelling … Read the rest of this great post here Posted by [...]
As you’re covering the Nader issue throughout this campaign, I hope you’ll give some thought to the issue I bring up in this short post:
The Key Issue Suspiciously Missing from Ralph Nader’s “Table”
I really hope this gets talked about more.