Top

That’s a Wrap

November 20, 2008 | Permalink | 4 Comments

We had considered staying around for the transition, but between finals and other law school stuff, that’s just not possible in any real way. So thanks for reading, and check this space for the eventual news of our next venture.

Hopefully, you’ll all give us the same rousing farewell that Ted Stevens received today.

Sphere: Related Content


FYI: Project Youthanized Discussion Panel On Elections & Social Media

October 20, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment

If you are in the Madison, WI area today, then feel free to stop by a panel on Elections & Social Media sponsored by Project Youthanized.  The panel will be moderated by UW Professor Katy Culver.  I will be serving on the panel along with:

  • Lee Brenner - Director of myspace Impact
  • Charlie Berens - Project Youthanize host and citizen-journalist for MTV
  • Dhavan Shah - UW Professor and expert on the psychology of media
  • Josh Burstein - CEO of Third Heat Productions

The event begins at 7pm tonight (October 20) and will be taking place in the AT&T room at the Pyle Center.  If you can’t make it, but are still interested, then tune into WisconsinEye, where the event will be broadcast.

Sphere: Related Content


FLAHSBACKS: John Edwards is an Ass

August 8, 2008 | Permalink | 1 Comment

Let me count the ways:

1) Cheating on his wife.

2) Running for President with this skeleton in his closet. What if he were nominated or chosen as VP?

If you don\'t know what defenestration is, then look it up.  It seems fitting...

3) Holding out his endorsement as meaningful when this was in the news, knowing the truth underneath.

4) Releasing a statement in which he tries to play the victim. You’re not going to guilt your way around this one.

Now, we’ve noted the problematic nature of John Edwards’ character before:

Edwards Initiates Operation Apology Drop

Edwards Campaign Conceals Internet History

Bob Shrum Blasts Edwards in New Book

Franky, there’s been little substance in either of Edwards’ too runs for presidency aside from the health care plan this time around, which was almost certainly something from Elizabeth, and not him. Edwards’ hubris and self-righteousness is really quite astonishing.

PS: It’s too bad that Kucinich’s network of spies couldn’t break this news earlier.

Sphere: Related Content


Quote of the Day

August 8, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment

John Edwards to Matt Lauer on May 23, 2007:

They’re gonna judge me as a human being whether I have the characteristics, integrity, honesty, openness to be President of the United States.

And no, the context doesn’t make it any less hypocritical.

Sphere: Related Content


Morning Thoughts: Polls and Hillary Clinton

July 25, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment

Three things this morning:

1. Nate Silver is probably right about why the election is tightening. (As opposed to the implications of racism being spewed by Chris Matthews and Joe Scarborough on MSNBC right now). The extra attention to foreign policy favors McCain, even though Obama is making up ground on that issue.

The upside for Obama though is that after this trip is over, he’s going to spend the rest of the election talking about the economy, while presumably retaining any foreign policy gains he made on this trip. My pointis that the issue focus can change, but the underlying dynamics tend not to, barring major gaffes or major positive moments.

In short, I think this is a short term necessary evil for greater gains for Obama later. (Barring some major other gaffe by him or someone involved in his campaign.)

2. In the counterintuitive thought of the day, does this foreign trip open the door for Hillary Clinton as VP?

The major problem in the past has been that Obama would be overshadowed. But now that he’s had a trip with some (OK, many) talking about presumptive he has seemed, Clinton would no longer overshadow Obama, and indeed it would probably be perceived as a really unselfish move by Obama. Moreover, it would be am implicit shift back to economic issues, while ignoring any questions about whether she was qualified to be President.

There’s still problems, of course: the two are said to not really get along. And that’s a major, major problem. Also, it would undermine Obama’s message of change. But I think the idea makes a lot more sense today than it did a week ago. Obama has enough presidential cache that being overshadowed is probably the least of VP concerns.

That said, supposedly the VP search team is completely separated from the political wing of Obama’s campaign. So this might just end up being hot air.

3. Don’t forget to listen to our interview on Sirius this afternoon. Or if you don’t get Sirius, check out any of our podcasts. We’ll be doing one at some point this weekend.

Sphere: Related Content


ANNOUNCEMENT: 2008Central.net Interviewed On Sirius Radio

July 24, 2008 | Permalink | 1 Comment

On Friday, July 25, at 5:30pm eastern, 2008Central.net’s Angelo S. Carusone and John Whitehouse will be guests on Sirius Radio’s The Blog Bunker on Indie Talk (Channel 110).  If you have access to Sirius tune in and have a listen…

Sphere: Related Content


McCain and Obama Statements on DC v. Heller

June 26, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment

McCain:
Today’s decision is a landmark victory for Second Amendment freedom in the United States. For this first time in the history of our Republic, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms was and is an individual right as intended by our Founding Fathers. I applaud this decision as well as the overturning of the District of Columbia’s ban on handguns and limitations on the ability to use firearms for self-defense.

Unlike Senator Obama, who refused to join me in signing a bipartisan amicus brief, I was pleased to express my support and call for the ruling issued today. Today’s ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller makes clear that other municipalities like Chicago that have banned handguns have infringed on the constitutional rights of Americans. Unlike the elitist view that believes Americans cling to guns out of bitterness, today’s ruling recognizes that gun ownership is a fundamental right — sacred, just as the right to free speech and assembly.

This ruling does not mark the end of our struggle against those who seek to limit the rights of law-abiding citizens. We must always remain vigilant in defense of our freedoms. But today, the Supreme Court ended forever the specious argument that the Second Amendment did not confer an individual right to keep and bear arms.

Obama:
“I have always believed that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms, but I also identify with the need for crime-ravaged communities to save their children from the violence that plagues our streets through common-sense, effective safety measures. The Supreme Court has now endorsed that view, and while it ruled that the D.C. gun ban went too far, Justice Scalia himself acknowledged that this right is not absolute and subject to reasonable regulations enacted by local communities to keep their streets safe. Today’s ruling, the first clear statement on this issue in 127 years, will provide much-needed guidance to local jurisdictions across the country.

“As President, I will uphold the constitutional rights of law-abiding gun-owners, hunters, and sportsmen. I know that what works in Chicago may not work in Cheyenne. We can work together to enact common-sense laws, like closing the gun show loophole and improving our background check system, so that guns do not fall into the hands of terrorists or criminals. Today’s decision reinforces that if we act responsibly, we can both protect the constitutional right to bear arms and keep our communities and our children safe.”

Sphere: Related Content


McCain and Obama Statements on North Korea Agreement

June 26, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment

McCain:

U.S. Senator John McCain today issued the following statement regarding today’s North Korea announcement:

“The announcement today that North Korea has provided information concerning elements of its nuclear program is a modest step forward, as will be the destruction of the disabled cooling tower of Yongbyon. But it is only a step covering one part of North Korea’s nuclear activities. It is important to remember our goal has been the full, permanent and verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. That must remain our goal. The Six Party agreement called for North Korea to make a full declaration of all its nuclear weapons and nuclear programs. Many questions remain about North Korea’s programs, including the disposition of plutonium at Yongbyon, the number and status of nuclear weapons, the nature of the highly-enriched uranium program, and the extent of proliferation activities in countries like Syria. I also want to make sure we fully account for the legitimate concerns of our South Korean and Japanes e allies as we move forward. I understand certain sanctions were lifted today, some may be lifted in 45 days, and others remain in place.

“As we review this declaration and attempt to verify North Korean claims, we must keep diplomatic and economic pressure on North Korea to meet all of its obligations under the Six Party agreement, including denuclearization. If we are unable to fully verify the declaration submitted today and if I am not satisfied with the verification mechanisms developed, I would not support the easing of sanctions on North Korea.”

Obama:
“This is a step forward, and there will be many more steps to take in the days ahead. Critical questions remain unanswered. We still have not verified the accuracy of the North Korean declaration. We must confirm the full extent of North Korea’s past plutonium production. We must also confirm its uranium enrichment activities, and get answers to disturbing questions about its proliferation activities with other countries, including Syria.

“The declaration has not yet been made available, so Congress has not had a chance to review it. Before weighing in on North Korea’s removal from the list of state sponsors of terrorism, Congress must take the next 45 days to examine the adequacy of the North Korean declaration and verification procedures. Sanctions are a critical part of our leverage to pressure North Korea to act. They should only be lifted based on North Korean performance. If the North Koreans do not meet their obligations, we should move quickly to re-impose sanctions that have been waived, and consider new restrictions going forward.

“We should continue to pursue the kind of direct and aggressive diplomacy with North Korea that can yield results. The objective must be clear: the complete and verifiable elimination of North Korea’s nuclear weapons programs, which only expanded while we refused to talk. As we move forward, we must not cede our leverage in these negotiations unless it is clear that North Korea is living up to its obligations.

“As President, I will work from the very beginning of my term in office to secure the American people and our interests in this vital region. We must work with diligence and determination with our friends and allies to end this dangerous threat, and to secure a lasting peace on the Korean peninsula.”

Sphere: Related Content


Suggestions?

June 4, 2008 | Permalink | 1 Comment

As we make the changeover to general election mode.  Are there any suggestions that you have for the site? Features? Story ideas? Topics you’d like us to discuss? Perhaps a forum for viewers to interact a bit more? Or, something else…? Please feel free to leave a comment or email us.

Sphere: Related Content


Why No Posts Lately?

May 8, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment

Apologies all around for the lack of posts lately.  Rest assured it’s unpleasant for us as well.  We will be back soon.

Both of us are law students and we are both tied up with final exams.  Exams will be over soon though, so hang in there and please accept our apologies.

In the meantime, feel free to contact us with questions, site suggestions, comments or complaints.  Also, if you would like to write for the site or if you’re a blogger and would like your content to be cross posted, please get in touch with us as well.

Best,

Angelo & John

[Photo Credit: AllPosters.com]

Sphere: Related Content


UPDATED: General Election And Democratic Primary Polls

March 26, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment

Our polls section has been updated to include the latest national Democratic Primary polls and we’ve also added polls for general election match-ups (McCain vs. Obama and McCain vs. Clinton).

Polling data will expanded in the coming weeks.

Sphere: Related Content


2008Central.net On The Radio This Morning…

March 7, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment

I (and possibly JW) will be guests on WLPO’s John Small show this morning at 11:35 am CST.  It’s an Illinois based station and the channel is 1220 AM Radio.  If you’re in the area, be sure to tune in.  If you’re not in the area, you may be able to listen to the internet stream here.

Sphere: Related Content


Happy Birthday George Washington

February 22, 2008 | Permalink | 1 Comment

George Washington

Today is George Washington’s birthday.  I’m not going to say much about it, but if you have a moment it’s worth at least checking over his bio.  If you don’t though, at least take a look at my favorite Washington quotes (and feel free to add yours to the comments)…

  • “Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action.”
  • “The name of AMERICAN, which belongs to you, in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of Patriotism, more than any appellation derived from local discriminations.”
  • “Worry is the interest paid by those who borrow trouble.”

And my very favorite…

  • “They [political parties] serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation, the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels, and modified by mutual interests.”

Sphere: Related Content


Some Housecleaning Notes

February 21, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment

First, any comment that espouses a slur or something patently untrue about a candidate will be marked as spam. That’s pretty much the extent of our moderation policy, aside from our automatic spam filter.

Second, watch out -over the next 24 hours or so, you’ll see some pretty dramatic aesthetic changes around here.

Sphere: Related Content


The Unfortunate Return Of Yellow Journalism

January 26, 2008 | Permalink | 3 Comments

In this video, I discuss the content and tone of 2008 election coverage.  In my opinion, yellow journalism has returned and voters must be cautious, wary and skeptical.  Most importantly, they must demand more…

Part 1 

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Part 2 

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Sphere: Related Content


Poll Vaulting: Hillary Clinton Solidifies Support

October 6, 2007 | Permalink | 2 Comments

A recently published Washington Post/ABC News poll presents an interesting perspective to the oft concluded notion that Hillary Clinton’s high negatives will hurt her in the general election.

The question was: “If [NAME] wins the [Democratic/Republican] nomination for president would you definitely vote for [him/her] in the general election for president in 2008, would you consider voting for [him/her] or would you definitely not vote for [him/her]?”  The date of the poll was September 30, 2007.

Graph1

Again, our usual caveat regarding the significance of polls applies to this one. However, there are a few things worth noting about it. First and foremost, Hillary’s ‘Definitely would vote for’ would numbers are pretty high for someone that consistently has such high negatives in just about any general election poll. Could it be that despite not liking Hillary people are still willing to vote for her? Moreover, I think it’s also worth noting that Hillary Clinton’s ‘Definitely would not vote for’ numbers are lower than all of the leading Republican contenders and John Edwards’ - only Obama has a lower score than Hillary in this field. The numbers themselves are likely more telling about the overall political climate than anything else. The fact that the Republicans scored such high ‘would not’ numbers only underscores the already well known fact that its going to be a challenging campaign for the GOP nominee because of the Iraq War (specifically) and the Bush Administration (generally).

Here are the results to the same question looked at over a period of time…

Hillary Clinton Support Trend

Obama Trend

John Edwards Support Trend

Rudy Giuliani Support Trend

John McCain Support Trend

Mitt Romney Support Trend

Worth noting: Of these candidates, the only one whose ‘definitely would not vote for’ numbers that decreased over time were Hillary Clinton’s.  At the very least, this polls demonstrates that Clinton’s early general election strategy is working with at least some folks.

Sphere: Related Content


Saturday Afternoon Catch Up (9/29/07)

September 29, 2007 | Permalink | Leave a Comment

Before getting into some serious blogging, here’s a crib sheet on what’s been happening in the ‘08 field:

  • Following news that Newt Gingrich would enter the race if he could get $30 million in pledges by October 21, 2007, Gingrich officially stated today that he would not be entering the race after all.  Why? Because the 3 week pledge drive would present legal problems for his non-profit group, American Solutions for Winning the Future.  We’ll try to connect with Steven Parkhurst over at DraftNewt.org this week to get their reaction.
  • Democratic candidate, John Edwards, has decided to opt in to the public financing system.  We’ll take a closer look at this decision in a later post, but for your information now…(1) Entering the public finance system places significant spending restrictions on a candidate…(2) Ambinder looks at the pros and cons of this decision.
  • Transcript of MSNBC’s Democratic Debate in New Hampshire hosted by Tim Russert.  We’ll have more on this later, since it was certainly a noteworthy debate.
  • Michelle Obama stirs things up when she says that if Barack Obama doesn’t win Iowa, then “it’s just a dream.” Was I the only person who thought of Ralph Cramden upon hearing this? ‘One of these days, Michelle…bang…ZOOM…to the moon!’
  • Mike Huckabee tackled the Bush Administration’s foreign policy in an attempt to substantially distinguish himself from his primary rivals.  Huckabee concluded that “this administration’s bunker mentality has been counterproductive both at home and abroad.”
  • Bill Richardson launched a new website that details his plan to remove all U.S. troops from Iraq and promises not to leave any residual forces.  Chris Dodd takes issue with the details.
  • If Iowa was your answer to the question “What state will decide who gets their Republican convention delegates first?” then you would be wrong.  It’s Wyoming (for now) and they will make the decision on January 5, 2008.

Anymore links you’d like to see?  Send them along (tips).

Sphere: Related Content


2008Central.net Goes Back Online Tomorrow…

September 13, 2007 | Permalink | Leave a Comment

And everyone is talking about it.  See…

matthewsmccain-copy.jpg

Sphere: Related Content


Next Page »

Bottom