Give It Up For Mike Bloomberg…
March 27, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment
He certainly knows how to keep his name in the news, as he is introducing Barack Obama today for an economic speech in NYC.
I’m not expecting him to formally endorse, but he’d probably consider it if he were otherwise going to get ignored.

Read more
Clinton to Appear on SNL Tonight and other notes.
March 1, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment
Let’s hope she’s funnier than in the debates. Video will be posted as soon as it’s available.
In other news:
The Texas caucus has disaster written all over it. There needs to be some sort of permanent leaders in these from now on who know what they’re doing. It’s ridiculous to elect a chair and secretary every time. Or, at least, let’s encourage campaigns to work together for on this.
Obama picked up a superdelegate in Alabama.
John Kerry of all people caused the Clinton campaign headaches in Texas.
The Washington Post editorial board (rightly) says both Obama and Clinton are pandering on NAFTA.
Kevin Sheekey, formerly the Bloomberg aide seemingly in charge of floating rumors of Bloomberg running for President, now floats rumors of Bloomberg being Obama’s VP.
Sphere: Related ContentBloomberg Officially Rules Out Run For President
February 28, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment

In an op-ed published in today’s New York Times, Mayor Mike Bloomberg officially rules out a run for president, writing:
I listened carefully to those who encouraged me to run, but I am not — and will not be — a candidate for president.
He ads some optimism about the remaining candidates and Read more
Sphere: Related ContentWhy Is Bloomberg Not Considered In Electability Scenarios?
January 23, 2008 | Permalink | 3 Comments
Mike Bloomberg has dropped hints of running as someone who can fix bipartisan bickering and get things done. He gave a major economic speech in Washington today. People are more than happy to cover what Bloomberg is doing.
But no one, and I mean no one, looks at Bloomberg in the context of election scenarios. He’s less likely to run against McCain or Obama, as either of them would take away a lot of his bipartisanship appeal. But the rest of the candidates certainly seem like fair game. Even against Hillary Clinton, Bloomberg rumors have floated.
Take this entry from the Plank. Electability is gone over with a fine tooth comb, just completely around the elephant int he room. Angelo just pointed out that absolutely no one is considering Bloomberg when discussing Edwards electability issues.
Or more recently, Obama commented to David Brody that while he could get Clinton’s supporters, he did not know if she could get his. And people went into a tizzy (see here, here, and here), speculating on whom Obama’s supporters might gravitate towards. Did any of them consider Bloomberg? Absolutely none of them. (Props to the commenters who did, though.)
Look, I’m not saying he’s definitely going to run against Clinton or definitely will not run against Obama. I doubt even he’s made up his mind. But it’s absurd to discuss him as a potential candidate and refuse to look into how he actually might affect things, particularly when you’re trying to look into the future.
If you want to know why so much horserace analysis is so bad, this is a perfect example. People need to look at what is right in front of them, and not just what they think is right in front of them.
When you have the likes of Al Gore, Mike Bloomberg, and Newt Gingrich going far beyond what candidates from either side are saying, it’s worth considering the viability of a candidate who could literally drop billions in the race, especially with the delegate leaders being those of limited appeal like Clinton and Romney right now.
[Image Credit: Flickr User wallyg under a Creative Commons license]
Sphere: Related ContentBloomberg Talks Economy In California; Takes Additional Steps Toward Run, Maybe
January 22, 2008 | Permalink | Leave a Comment
Mike Bloomberg, who continues to deny that he will run for president, visited the electoral college rich state of California this past weekend to discuss the economy. Appearing with California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, Bloomberg announced the creation of a nonpartisan coalition, focused on infrastructure projects across the US, called “Building America’s Future.” The coalition is described as follows:
It is envisioned that the coalition will be comprised of state and local elected officials from around the nation and will become a repository of best practices on infrastructure funding issues. In the short-term, the coalition will work with the presidential candidates and the platform committees of the national political parties to ensure that the next president understands the enormity of the infrastructure crisis and is committed to increasing federal funding for infrastructure. The Rockefeller Foundation has committed to provide funding for coalition staffing and resources.
Keeping in line with his independent status, Bloomberg blasted both parties in Washington for not doing enough about infrastructure, saying:
“We cannot hand our children a nation that is crumbling from neglect…But Washington, as you know, spends money on winning votes and collecting campaign cash, no matter what the real needs are.”
Following up with the economy theme, the NY Times offers a glowing insight into Bloomberg’s ideas to battle poverty:
The official poverty line is itself one of the main things the mayor wants to do something about. The federal government currently puts it at income of $20,650 a year for a family of four, a calculation set at three times the annual cost of basic groceries. Mr. Bloomberg wants to break free of that archaic formula, and he seems unafraid that the new metric could reveal that there are even more poor New Yorkers than we thought.
The mayor, who made his personal fortune analyzing data, seems inclined to factor in what households spend on the real big-ticket items of urban life. That includes housing, child care and utilities — expenses that did not loom as large 40 years ago. Food, meanwhile, now claims a smaller proportion of income — about one-seventh — thanks in part to mass-production.
Mr. Bloomberg, who is working with the National Academy of Sciences and other experts, appears to be leaning toward factoring in housing costs and counting assistance, like food stamps, as income. The resulting yardstick should not only be more reliable, it should also help gauge the success of investments that New York is making — about $150 million, mostly in private funds — to help the poor. It could also provide a model for cities that have struggled with poverty.
As if the California event wasn’t enough, on his way out there, Bloomberg met with a ballot access expert in Texas:
Bloomberg met privately Friday with Clay Mulford, who is well-versed in third-party ballot access and served as campaign manager for Perot, according to an individual close to the mayor. The Texas businessman sought the presidency in 1992 and 1996.
The meeting with Mulford came less than two months before Bloomberg would be able to start gathering signatures to get on the ballot and meet Texas’ early deadline.
If Bloomberg wants a chance at winning the state’s large slice of electoral votes — 34 — he would need to collect about 74,100 signatures by May 12, and he could not begin circulating petitions in Texas until March 5. Not only does he have a short window to petition — the signatures need to be from Texas residents who did not vote in a party primary.
During a news conference, Bloomberg was asked about the significance of being in Texas, with its early ballot deadline. He seemed irritated with the question, having denied being in the race only a moment earlier.
”I just said I’m not a candidate — it couldn’t be clearer,” he said. “Which of the words do you not understand? People have urged me to do it, but I’m not a candidate.”
Despite his public denials, Bloomberg has been consulting with people such as Mulford and is conducting an analysis of voter data in all 50 states to better understand his chances as a third-party candidate. Aides have said he would delay a decision until after the major parties produce clear front-runners.
I’m still not convinced a Bloomberg candidacy is more likely than not. That said, I’m working on a longer post that looks at the potential issues a Bloomberg run raises for both the Mayor and the potential Democratic and Republican nominees.
Sphere: Related ContentBloomberg Featured In Ads In Iowa And New Hampshire
December 28, 2007 | Permalink | Leave a Comment
New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg may deny that he’s running for president, but you wouldn’t be able to guess that with his Google Adwords buy, issuing a statement on international events and now by running newspaper ads in Iowa and New Hampshire. Yesterday, Mayors Against Illegal Guns ran ads in
The Des Moines Register and The New Hampshire Union Leader that asked where the candidates stand on illegal guns and contained a picture of Mayor Bloomberg and several other mayors from the organization.
It was a gentle reminder about the questionnaire that the organization submitted to all the campaigns earlier this month that they asked the campaigns to return to them by January 2, 2008. Thus far, none of the surveys have been turned in yet.
Sphere: Related ContentCandidate Statements on the Assassination of Benazir Bhutto
December 27, 2007 | Permalink | Leave a Comment
“Benazir Bhutto was a courageous woman. Her death, and the deaths of so many of her supporters, is more than just a tragedy. It is a testament to the will of the Pakistani people to see democracy restored. My thoughts and prayers are with the families of those who died today.
“Ms. Bhutto knew the dangers to her safety. But she would not be intimidated. We also must not be intimidated.
A leader has died, but democracy must live. The United States government cannot stand by and allow Pakistan’s return to democracy to be derailed or delayed by violence.
We must use our diplomatic leverage and force the enemies of democracy to yield: President Bush should press Musharraf to step aside, and a broad-based coalition government, consisting of all the democratic parties, should be formed immediately. Until this happens, we should suspend military aid to the Pakistani government. Free and fair elections must also be held as soon as possible.
It is in the interests of the US that there be a democratic Pakistan that relentlessly hunts down terrorists. Musharraf has failed, and his attempts to cling to power are destabilizing his country. He must go.”
“I am profoundly saddened and outraged by the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, a leader of tremendous political and personal courage. I came to know Mrs. Bhutto over many years, during her tenures as Prime Minister and during her years in exile. Mrs. Bhutto’s concern for her country, and her family, propelled her to risk her life on behalf of the Pakistani people. She returned to Pakistan to fight for democracy despite threats and previous attempts on her life and now she has made the ultimate sacrifice. Her death is a tragedy for her country and a terrible reminder of the work that remains to bring peace, stability, and hope to regions of the globe too often paralyzed by fear, hatred, and violence.
“Let us pray that her legacy will be a brighter, more hopeful future for the people she loved and the country she served. My family and I extend my condolences and deepest sympathies to the victims and their families and to the people of Pakistan.”
“I was deeply saddened today to learn about the death of Pakistani opposition leader Benazir Bhutto. My deepest condolences go out to the family and supporters of this remarkable woman, an individual who paid the ultimate price for her embrace of moderation and rejection of extremism.
“The death of Benazir Bhutto underscores yet again the grave dangers we face in the world today and particularly in countries like Pakistan, where the forces of moderation are arrayed in a fierce battle against those who embrace violent Islamic extremism.
“Given Pakistan’s strategic location, the international terrorist groups that operate from its soil, and its nuclear arsenal, the future of that country has deep implications for the security of the United States and its allies. America must stand on the right side of this ongoing struggle.
“In my numerous visits to Pakistan - to Islamabad, to Peshawar, even to the tribal areas of Waziristan - I have seen first hand the many challenges that face the political leadership there, challenges so graphically portrayed by today’s tragedy. There are, in Pakistan, brave individuals who seek to lead their country away from extremism and instability and into the light of a better day. America, I believe, must do all we can to support them.”
“We are still learning the details of today’s tragic events in Pakistan, but this is a stark reminder that America must not only stay on high alert, but remain actively engaged across the globe. Pakistan has long been a key part in the war against extremism and radical jihadists. For those who think Iraq is the sole front in the War on Terror, one must look no further than what has happened today. America must show its commitment to stand with all moderate forces across the Islamic world and together face the defining challenge of our generation – the struggle against violent, radical jihadists.
“At this difficult time, our thoughts and prayers go to the family of Benazir Bhutto, and to all the people of Pakistan who are fighting against extremist forces that would commit such heinous acts as the whole world has witnessed today.”
“I am shocked and saddened by the death of Benazir Bhutto in this terrorist atrocity. She was a respected and resilient advocate for the democratic aspirations of the Pakistani people. We join with them in mourning her loss, and stand with them in their quest for democracy and against the terrorists who threaten the common security of the world,” said United States Senator Barack Obama.
“The assassination of Benazir Bhutto is a tragic event for Pakistan and for Democracy in Pakistan. Her murderers must be brought to justice and Pakistan must continue the path back to democracy and the rule of law. Her death is a reminder that terrorism anywhere — whether in New York, London, Tel Aviv or Rawalpindi — is an enemy of freedom. We must redouble our efforts to win the Terrorists’ War on Us.”
“I am deeply troubled by the news accounts this morning of Pakistani opposition leader and former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto’s assassination in a suicide attack. This is devastating news for the people of Pakistan, and my prayers go out to them as we follow developments regarding this dire situation.
”The terrible violence surrounding Pakistan’s upcoming election stands in stark contrast to the peaceful transition of power that we embrace in our country through our Constitution. On this sad day, we are reminded that while our democracy has flaws, it stands as a shining beacon of hope for nations and people around the world who seek peace and opportunity through self-government.”
“Benazir Bhutto was a brave and historic leader for Pakistan. Her assassination is a sad and solemn event, and our hearts go out to her family and to the Pakistani people. But we will not let this contemptible, cowardly act delay the march of progress in Pakistan for a single second.
“I have seen firsthand in Pakistan, and in meetings with Prime Minister Bhutto and President Musharraf, the instability of the country and the complexity of the challenges they face. At this critical moment, America must convey both strength and principle. We should do everything in our power to help bring the perpetrators of this heinous act to justice and to ensure that Bhutto’s movement toward democracy continues.”
“This is a terrible day. My heart goes out to Benazir Bhutto’s family, friends and followers.
“Like her father before her, Benazir Bhutto worked her whole life – and gave her life – to help Pakistan become a democratic, secular and modern Muslim country. She was a woman of extraordinary courage who returned to Pakistan in the face of death threats and even after an assassination attempt the day of her return, she did not flinch. It was a privilege to know her these many years and to call her a friend.
“I am convinced Ms. Bhutto would have won free and fair elections next week. The fact that she was by far Pakistan’s most popular leader underscores the fact that there is a vast, moderate majority in Pakistan that must have a clear voice in the system. Her assassination makes it all the more urgent that Pakistan return to a democratic path.
“This fall, I twice urged President Musharraf to provide better security for Ms. Bhutto and other political leaders – I wrote him before her return and after the first assassination attempt in October. The failure to protect Ms. Bhutto raises a lot of hard questions for the government and security services that must be answered.
“I know that Benazir’s followers will be tempted to lash out in anger and violence. I urge them to remain calm – and not play into the hands of the forces of destruction. I urge Pakistan’s leaders to open a fully accountable and transparent investigation. We must find out who was behind this and bring those responsible to justice. And the United States should offer any assistance necessary, including investigative teams, to get to the bottom of this horror.
“The way to honor Benazir Bhutto is to uphold the values for which she gave her life: democracy, moderation and social justice. I join with the Pakistani people in mourning the loss of a dear friend.”
“Today’s news from Pakistan is both shocking and saddening. As a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, I have had the opportunity to travel to Pakistan and come to know Former Prime Minister Bhutto very well over the years. I spoke to her personally several weeks ago and have stayed in close contact with her since. She was a respected leader who played an important part in moving Pakistan toward democracy.
“As we recognize the loss of a leader today, we must also recognize the implication of today’s tragedy to the security of the region and to that of the United States.
“At this critical time we must do everything in our power to help Pakistan continue the path toward democracy and full elections. Our first priority must be to ensure stability in this critical nuclear state.
“The United States should also stand ready to provide assistance in investigating this heinous act. And as Pakistan perpetrators to justice, it should also demonstrate that it will not allow such violence to derail democracy and proceed with elections in a timely manner.”
“This is a very dangerous moment for the world. Prime Minister Bhuttorepresented the forces of reform and the hope for an end to repression in a troubled region, and her death is a major loss to those efforts.”
“This terrible tragedy also underscores the need for the United States to adopt a new foreign policy toward the entire region because our current policy is all wrong. Our interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan has opened wide the doors of repression and violence. At this very moment, we should be working with leaders of the region to convene a meeting at the highest levels to begin a new effort towards stabilization and peace.”
“The United States must take a new direction in Pakistan and throughout the region. I met her several times, both in Washington and New York. She was deeply and genuinely dedicated to Pakistan. This is a tragic loss.”
“Today all New Yorkers, including the more than 100,000 who can trace their heritage to Pakistan, are saddened to learn about the assassination of Pakistan’s Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. Hers was a voice for democracy, and the silencing of it — by such brutal means - is a shock to us all. Ms. Bhutto’s death — and the deaths of the many other Pakistanis who were killed today simply for expressing their views - is a great loss for friends of democracy and for everyone who is united in the fight against terror. It’s also a grim reminder that many people consider the freedoms we cherish a threat. The perpetrators of this violent act must be brought to justice, and it is my hope that President Musharraf will follow through on free and fair elections in January as a testament to Ms. Bhutto’s legacy.”
Any other comments by other candidates will be added as soon as possible.
Sphere: Related Content2008Central.net’s Presidential Election Podcast (10/29/07)
October 30, 2007 | Permalink | 2 Comments
This podcast covers: (1) Poll craziness - Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney; (2) Romney’s speech on faith; (3) Obama ratcheting up pressure on Clinton; (4) Consequences in Florida for DNC; (5) Chris Dodd on Meet The Press; (6) Tom Tancredo is not running for re-election; (7) Kucinich, Richardson and UFOs; (8) Edwards brings the hammer on UNC student reporter; (9) Mike Bloomberg buying Google AdWords; (10) and more…
Feel free to email us questions/suggestions for next week’s podcast (you can also email an audio file of your question and we’ll include it in the podcast).
Subscribe to 2008Central.net’s Presidential Election Podcast
Sphere: Related ContentMike Bloomberg Buying 2008 Election Related Google Adwords
Just saying is all…
I noticed today that Mike Bloomberg has purchased Google Adwords, some of which must be related to the 2008 election, since they are popping up with other election related links on election related stories. I don’t think this means anything other than an attempt to drive some traffic to his website, while putting in minimal effort to keep his options open should an opportunity arise for him to enter the race.
Related at 2008Central.net:
- Bloomberg Continues to Deny He’s Running (8/21/07)
- A Taste of Who Mike Bloomberg Is (7/3/07)
Bloomberg Continues to Deny He’s Running
This time, he added that he couldn’t win anyways:
“Nobody’s going to elect me president of the United States,” he told Dan Rather for a program that will air Tuesday on cable’s HDNet channel. “What I’d like to do is to be able to influence the dialogue. I’m a citizen.”
The billionaire left the Republican Party recently to become an independent, throwing into overdrive the speculation that he will make a run for the White House.
Bloomberg likes to throw water on the rumors while simultaneously keeping them alive behind the scenes. His aides are not bashful about promoting the idea that he could jump into the race next year as a self-financed independent candidate.
Rather, after interviewing Bloomberg, went on to tell Chris Matthews that he would not bet against Bloomberg running against NY Gov. Eliot Spitzer when his term was up.
![]()
We’ve said constantly that Bloomberg would run only if both parties nominated candidates towards their extremes; perhaps if Edwards and Romney were nominated, but certainly he would only run if he thought he could win. With the current political winds seeming to indicate that moderates will probably be nominated - and Bloomberg will certainly not run against fellow NY politicians Clinton or Giuliani - it’s time to put the Bloomberg idea on the back burner.
[Photo Credit: flickr user DavisMcDavis]
Sphere: Related ContentFormer Senator Sam Nunn Considers Third Party Run For President
August 20, 2007 | Permalink | 10 Comments
Speaking to The Atlanta Journal Constitution, former Georgia Senator Sam Nunn, a Democrat, indicated that he’s interested in running for President as an independent:
“It’s a possibility, not a probability,” said Nunn, now the head of a nonprofit organization out to reduce the threat posed by nuclear, biological and chemical weaponry. “My own thinking is, it may be a time for the country to say, ‘Timeout. The two-party system has served us well, historically, but it’s not serving us now.’”
Recognizing the challenges that he would face as a third party candidate, Nunn hopes that a run for president would at least offer him the ability to shape/influence foreign policy as well as gain attention for his cause of reducing stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction.
Concerned about the future, growing international frustrations with the United States and the Iraq War, Nunn said:
“[The Iraq War is] A fiasco, which we’ve basically mishandled in all directions. We’ll get over it, because we’re a strong country, and we’re indispensable in the sense that we’re the [world] leader. But right now, it’s going to take at least 10 years to rebuild U.S. credibility.”
“Nor has the Bush administration been able to create the necessary climate to make it easy for the world’s Muslim population to isolate jihadist terrorists.”
“We’re in a race between cooperation and catastrophe. And to get cooperation you have to have a vision, and you have to listen. And we’re not perceived as having a vision in this country, and we’re not perceived as listening.”
Nunn served as a Senator from Georgia for 24 years. During his time he was a fairly conservative Democrat, who was able to cross party lines on a range of issues from social
to national security. He’s incredibly well respected in the field of national security, so much so that he was often discussed as a possible running mate for John Kerry during the 2004 campaign. His previous ability to cross party lines, his credibility on the major issues of our time and the presence of Unity08 (and/or Bloomberg’s billions) certainly leave open the possibility that Nunn could be more than just a blip on the political radar screen. Earlier this month, Nunn confirmed meeting with Mike Bloomberg, which he described as follows:
“We’ve had conversations about frustration with the fact that the process is flawed. I’ve told him … it may be time for some serious people to look at what I call a time-out and having people of good faith in the Democratic and Republican parties to come together and address the issues that the parties don’t seem to want to address.”
At this point, it’s not clear that Nunn will even be running. All we know is that: 1) he does not intend to make his decision until winter 2008, at the earliest; 2) he will absolutely not accept the VP slot on a Republican or Democratic ticket; 3) there’s definitely an independent minded undercurrent in the political waters that is still largely overlooked by just about everyone and could end up being very influential in the 2008 election.
Sphere: Related ContentPress Released: July 2-9
July 8, 2007 | Permalink | 2 Comments
Press Released will cover press releases over the past week that may have gotten overlooked in the media cycle. It’s not meant to be complete, but should be comprehensive including any release relating to national politics. Any release that is calendar related, not of national concern, or previously blogged about will not be covered here.
This week, we’re also excluding financial report press releases; we’re going to include them in our reports of the detailed financial results we post later in the week.
Duncan Hunter
John McCain
Mitt Romney
Ron Paul
Rudy Giuliani
Sam Brownback
Tom Tancredo
Barack Obama
Bill Richardson
Christopher Dodd
Dennis Kucinich
Hillary Clinton
Joe Biden
John Edwards
Mike Gravel
Mike Bloomberg
Technical note: all language I use to describe a release is what the candidate uses or what I judge to be the most accurate way of describing the candidate’s position; e.g., if a candidate calls global warming the ‘climate crisis’ I will use that; if they call it ‘alleged global warming’ I will do the same.
Sphere: Related ContentA Taste of Who Mike Bloomberg Is
Jon Friedman of Market Watch has his Bloomberg 101 up for people who don’t know much about him the person:
So here’s my Bloomberg 101:
- Why will Bloomberg run? He loves beating other folks at their game. I can imagine how much satisfaction Mike must be getting from receiving more publicity lately than his predecessor, Rudy Giuliani. The former mayor couldn’t have been happy when Bloomberg recently left the Republican Party, because Mike’s standing as an independent candidate could eventually threaten Giuliani’s chances.
- Why is Bloomberg in politics? Conspiracy theorist that I am, I always figured Mike was influenced by “City Hall,” the 1996 movie with Al Pacino as a short, brilliant, brassy, ethnic mayor. (Hello, Mike!) Check out the movie sometime.
- It may not be easy for reporters to get a lot of “dirt” on Bloomberg. He has a knack for building a superloyal staff. Sure, Bloomberg paid above-average salaries, but people rallied around him because he created a winning atmosphere and he cared about his employees.
- Bloomberg has a short fuse but really means no harm. He will, on occasion, call out a reporter for asking a less than intelligent question.
- If you’re lucky, Bloomberg will favor you with a raunchy joke now and then. When he ran his company, he got a kick out of saying stuff you’d hear in a locker room or on a Wall Street trading desk.
- The endearing joke about Bloomberg at one time was that he’d “think Yiddish and dress British.” He was regarded as such an Anglophile that people thought his chief goal was someday to be named U.S. ambassador to the United Kingdom (or the Court of St. James, as it was once known).
- At the recent Time 100 dinner, Medford, Mass., native Bloomberg cited Arnold “Red” Auerbach, the legendary visionary behind the Boston Celtics’ championships, as one of his heroes. I’ve heard that his favorite actresses include, Cybill Shepherd and Sharon Stone. Word also is that he had great affection for “Blazing Saddles.”
- Perhaps the most helpful piece of information I can impart is Bloomberg’s favorite pet expression. It may just be the key to his success, too. It’s something he tells colleagues to make sure they don’t let him down. It’s a four-word statement, or warning: “Don’t f*** it up!”
An example of the sass he gives to reporters can be seen in a recent article with the NY press over crowding on the 4/5 line:
“I take the Lex line most days and it’s not that crowded,” the MetroCard-carrying mayor told several hundred people at a Crain’s New York Business breakfast forum in Midtown.
“So you stand next to people. Get real. This is New York. What’s wrong with that?” added Bloomberg.
And as someone who has lived in NY, I can assure you for better or worse that the tone Bloomberg used was not passive denial, but more of a combative disbelief.
[Photo Credit: Cnn]
Sphere: Related ContentPress Released: Week of June 18-24
June 24, 2007 | Permalink | Leave a Comment
Press Released will cover press releases over the past week that may have gotten overlooked in the media cycle. It’s not meant to be complete, but should be comprehensive including any release relating to national politics.
Barack Obama
Bill Richardson
Christopher Dodd
Dennis Kucinich
Hillary Clinton
Joe Biden
John Edwards
Duncan Hunter
Fred Thompson
Jim Gilmore
Mike Huckabee
Mitt Romney
Newt Gingrich
Ron Paul
Rudy Giuliani
Sam Brownback
Tom Tancredo
Mike Bloomberg
Technical note: all language I use to describe a release is what the candidate uses or what I judge to be the most accurate way of describing the candidate’s position; if a candidate calls global warming the ‘climate crisis’ I will use that; if they call it ‘alleged global warming’ I will do the same.
Sphere: Related Content2008Central.net’s Presidential Election Podcast (06/24/07)
June 24, 2007 | Permalink | Leave a Comment
This week’s podcast covers…
- Mike Bloomberg departing the GOP
- Fred Thompson to announce soon?
- John McCain and Mitt Romney’s political scuffle
- Hillary Clinton booed at the Take Back America Conference: What’s it mean?
- 2008Central.net’s John Whitehouse attended the “Generation Barack Obama” event in New York City on June 22, 2007. What were his impressions?
- Despite a rough couple of weeks, Rudy Giuliani remains the leader of the pack
- Notes on the second tier
- A look ahead to the close of the second fundraising quarter of 2007 and the significance of primary date movement in Floria and New Jersey
- And more…
Feel free to email us questions/suggestions for next week’s podcast (you can also email an audio file of your question and we’ll include it in the podcast).
Subscribe to 2008Central.net’s Presidential Election Podcast




